Fallen Angels and Nephilim

The Annunaki came to earth for gold from the planet Nibiru. The Annunaki workers were overburdened and wanted Enki, one of the leaders, to make a slave race to mine the gold for them.

People have questions as to exactly who were the fallen angels and the Nephilim. The Annunaki (Ancient Aliens) And The Creation of The “Black Headed” People

The questions arise because people confuse the story of the fallen angels coming down to earth as if it was Satan and his followers and it happened in the beginning. This belief and confusion is further compounded by the fact the story continues with earth human women already existing.

Basically it amounts to the different stories of the Sumerian tablets and the Christian bible being confused as to the true sequence of events and facts, which if known, would place these stories in order. Resulting in less confusion.

I personally despise the Annunaki as a wholly immoral, egotistical, ruthless and conniving race of alien humanoids. They are advanced technologically, but very immature emotionally.

The problems they caused on earth were the repercussions of their own doing. In other words, the terrible things that happened on earth were the direct result of the way they lived and conducted their lives and interactions with others.

The absolute worst of it was that every time they did things that resulted in problems, they shifted the blame and killed the humans. Never once thinking or taking blame for their own troubles they themselves created.

If you have not viewed and read the tablets of Enki and Atrahasis you should start there.

One Annunaki leader would not grant a privilege to another Annunaki so the later thought of being offended and sought revenge. They would seek help in the revenge and that lead to more Annunaki involved and some trickery or war between the so called “gods”. This happened often between the “gods”. A reasonable person would think they would stop all the nonsense, at least when the giants started devouring humans, but no, the entire debacle only came to a head when the use of several of what we would call atomic bombs were used.

As you will see, this situation with the fallen angels and Nephilim is no exception to the depravity of the Annunaki “gods”. It becomes so complicated it is hard to understand.

It is said the Annunaki were tall at about 7 to 8 feet. They can be seen seated in the pictures with helmets that have horns. The earthlings can also be seen as shorter with helmets without horns. If the person sitting stood, he would be a couple feet taller than the others. Since he is eye level in the picture, he would be the distance from the middle of the knees to the middle of the hips taller.

Enki, an Annunaki leader, after creating Adam and Eve (originally sterile) and others created that could reproduce, had sexual relations with two earthling human women. The women bore children. A male and female. The male and female offspring by Enki and the earthling human women had greater intelligence. I have not seen any writings where they are described as being taller or living longer. The male child was named Adapa. The female was named Titi. These offspring were called AdaMite humans. There is a story the wind had been blowing for seven days and Adapa was tired of it, wishing it would stop. It stopped.

Enki impregnated these two earth human women for his own selfish reasons. I do not think he was as successful as he had hoped in creating a good pure human species, so he cheated. He mated with two earth human women to improve the human bloodline. He then claimed the children were of an earth human man and woman. He later confessed his treachery to his brother.

Enki’s brother, the Annunaki earth commander Enlil, was furious at learning of this and he wanted to kill his brother, but did not. The creation of humans, not to mention the mixing of their blood with humans, was taboo to him.

My assumption of not creating a perfect species of humans is evidenced by the amount of afflictions with which humans can be born. Or a human man and woman can produce strikingly different offspring from each birth. Lloyd Pye has done and is doing work in this area.

The AdaMite humans Adapa and Titi mated. Their offspring were twins, Ka-in and Abael (Cain and Abel). They were the first AdaPite humans. They were the first generation of human with human offspring, but with some direct Annunaki blood in the parents.

After the earth humans were created, 200 Annunaki men, sometimes called Igigi or the watchers, came down to Earth from the Mars gold relay station to attend a wedding. They had heard of the earth human women and decided to abduct, or kidnap, some for wives before they left Mars.

They too had offspring. These offspring were giants, or the Nephilim.

It is not clearly mentioned why these offspring were specifically different, being giants, than the offspring of Enki and the two earth human women.

Enki mated with AdaMite earth human women. The offspring mated and created AdaPite offspring. The 200 Annunaki Igigi men mated with AdaPite earth human women, not the AdaMite earth human women.

Enki and first generation earth human women had offspring with Annunaki blood and the offspring were AdaMite humans. Then those offspring, which were AdaMite, mated through incest. Their offspring were twins Ka-in and Abael (Cain and Abel). Who Ka-in and Abael mated with is not known. It just states they were AdaPite human men and women. In other words, they had less Annunaki blood.

W can not forget the original humans Enki created was with a mixture of native creature of earth blood (bigfoot type humanoids) and Annunaki blood in a clay vessel and then impregnated an Annunaki female for gestation.

As you can see there was created a very corrupted gene pool which included the genes of an earth native bigfoot humanoid type creature, Annunaki blood, human blood and and then Annunaki blood was again added.

By the amount of implications in the tablets, it is very possible that Enki made hundreds of attempts at creating earth humans and ended up with many different variations. There are statements the Annunaki called the first Adam and Eve variety “the black headed people”. It is self evident there are also other skin colors including the white blue eyed humans.

It is also mentioned the life span of earth humans was changed a couple of times, the last being a life span of 120 earth years. It is not mentioned if this would need to be done through another creation of humans. There is an instance of the Annunaki granting eternal life, so it may be possible without new creations.

I might also add the original Adam and Eve could not reproduce. They were later given an injection to make them capable of reproduction (injection of Annunaki DNA?). If this is the case, Then life spans of humans may be changed through injection.

The point here is Enki did a lot of experimentation. He created a lot of humans and animals. He created a lot of animals and may have created animals like unicorns, mermaids, pegasus and minotaurs. They may have actually once existed through Enki’s experimentation with DNA.

The giants ate their way through house and home. It is stated there was no more food to feed them. The giants began to devour earth humans.

The 200 Annunaki men also taught their wives many Annunaki secret things like makeup, incantations and war, that they should not have taught them.

Because of all the turmoil and trouble caused by the giants and the teaching of their secrets the 200 Annunaki Igigi men from the Mars gold relay station were then called the fallen angels.

They did come to earth and mate with earth human women. But that is not the reason they were called fallen angels. The tablets imply it was because of the trouble they brought upon everyone by doing so.

I tend to see this trend in the Annunaki and in humans. When they have done something not right, they tend to hide, excuse or otherwise divert attention away from the really bad portions of what they did.

In this case, the worst was the long term repercussions of the giant offspring and humans knowing Annunaki secrets like war, not that they came to earth and kidnapped the earth human women. By telling the story the way it is told, it causes confusion.

The supreme example of this was Enki. he was the worst of all.

Enki was on earth from the beginning to the end when the Annunaki left. He set the entire story of his time on earth down in 14 tablets. He did tell of the 200 Annunaki Igigi coming to earth from the Mars gold relay station and their kidnapping of earth human women. But he did not mention the fallen angels or Nephilim once. This has added to the confusion.

If the truth be told, Enki was the one that should have been labeled as a fallen angel. He caused all of this. But, as the evils of fate would have it, Enki later became the King of the Annunaki on Nibiru.

But as so often happens, this situation is further confused. The earth commander Enlil and his brother Enki, both sons of the Annunaki King, who caused so much trouble, killing, wars and devastation on earth, somehow have confused the issues for history and made, Shamjaza, the leader of the 200 Annunaki Igigi workers from Mars the Satan of our Christian bible. They seem to have implied all the troubles on earth were due to him. The book of Enoch especially names him as Satan.

The flood was a convent way to kill off the unruly and deadly giants and the humans that made to much noise.

Even though the Annunaki returned to earth after the flood and started to rebuild, collected more gold for the atmosphere of Nibiru, and ended up with the earth commander Enlil unleashing some atomic type weapons that devastated a good portion of the middle east, Shamjaza is still the historical Satan. If there was ever someone that could be labeled the ultimate patsy, it was him.

Genesis 6

And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, Creation of the earthling humans that could reproduce.

That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. The 200 Annunaki Igigi from the Mars gold relay station took earthling human wives. These 200 Annunaki Igigi are also referred to as the fallen angels.

And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. They reasoned the Annunaki portion will be breed out of them over time.

There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. The giants, or Nephilim, were the offspring of earthling human women and the 200 Annunaki Igigi.

The following are Sumerian tablet video listings with descriptions. Do not confuse the descriptions as a replacement for reading/seeing the videos. Each video has its own viewing link below. Enki videos as downloads are available here as WMV.

The Sumerians And Akkadians Were Blacks

Controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.

To understand this dichotomy we have to look at the history of scholarship surrounding the rise of Sumero-Akkadian studies. The study of the Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians and Elamites began with the decipherment of the cuneiform script by Henry Rawlinson (1851). Henry Rawlinson (1810-1895) had spent most of his career in the Orient. This appears to have given him an open mind in regards to history. He recognized the Ancient Model of History, the idea that civilization was founded by the Kushite or Hamitic people of the Bible.

As result, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite (Cushite) origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”. In Rawlinson’s day the (agglutinative Turanian speaking) Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians.

Rawlinson identified these Akkadians as Turanian or Scythic people. But he made it clear that these ancient Scythic or Turanian speaking people were Kushites or Blacks.

A major supporter of Rawlinson was Edward Hincks (1792-1866). Hincks continued Rawlinson’s work and identified the ancient group as Chaldeans, and also called them Turanian speakers. Hincks, though, never discussed their ethnic origin.

A late comer to the study of the Sumerians and the Akkadians was Julius Oppert (1825-1905). Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents. He made it clear that the Chaldean and Akkadian people spoke different languages. He noted that the original founders of Mesopotamia civilization called themselves Ki-en-gi “land of the true lords” (Kang, Tr. “predecessors, pra-fathers”, later also Kangars). It was the Semitic speakers who called themselves Akkadians.

Assyrians called the Ki-en-gi people Sumiritu “the sacred language”. Oppert popularized the Assyrian name Sumer, for the original founders of the civilization. Thus we have today the Akkadians and Sumerians of ancient Mesopotamia.

Oppert began to popularize the idea that the Sumerians were related to the contemporary Altaic and Turanian speaking people, e.g., Turks and Magyar (Hungarian) speaking people. He made it clear that the Akkadians were Semites like himself (however, these Semitic people were using an agglutinative language, instead of a flexive Semitic language). To support this idea Oppert pointed out that typological features between Sumerian and Altaic languages existed. This feature was agglutination.

The problem with identifying the Sumerians as descendants (i.e. ancestors) from contemporary Turanian speakers resulted from the fact that Sumerian and the Turkish languages are not genetically related (however, the quantity of genetically related words constitutes a significant portion of Sumerian vocabulary). As a result Oppert began to criticize the work of Hincks (who was dead at the time) in relation to the identification of the Sumerian people as Turanian following the research of Rawlinson.

Oppert knew Rawlinson had used African languages to decipher cuneiform writing. But he did not compare the Sumerian to African languages, probably, due to the fact that he knew they were related given Rawlinson’s earlier research.

It is strange to some observers that Oppert never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians, Kangars). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks. For Oppert to have debated this issue with Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe.

Although Oppert successfully hid the recognition that the Akkadians and the Sumerians both referred to themselves as sag-gig-ga “black heads”, some researchers were unable to follow the status quo and ignore this reality. For example, Francois Lenormant (1837-1883) made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages. This idea was hard to reconcile with the depiction of people on the Persian monuments, especially the Behistun monument, which depicted Negroes (with curly hair and beards) representing the Assyrians, Jews and Elamites who ruled the area. As a result, Oppert began the myth that the Sumerian languages was isolated from other languages spoken in the world even though it shared typological features with the Altaic languages. Oppert taught Akkadian-Sumerian in many of the leading Universities in France and Germany. Many of his students soon began to dominate the Academe, or held chairs in Sumerian and Akkadian studies, these researchers continued to perpetuate the (generally, contained only inside the Euro-centric academic school) myth that the Elamite and Sumerian languages were not related.

There was no way to keep from researchers who read the original Sumerian, Akkadian and Assyrian text that these people recognized that they were ethnically Blacks. This fact was made clear by Albert Terrien de LaCouperie (1845-1894). Born in France, de LaCouperie was a well known linguist and China expert. Although native of France, most of his writings are in English. In the journal he published called the Babylonian and Oriental Record, he outlined many aspects of ancient history. In these pages he made it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and even the Assyrians who called themselves salmat kakkadi “black headed people”, were all Blacks of Kushite origin. Even though de LaCouperie taught at the University of London, the prestige of Oppert, and the fact that the main centers for Sumero-Akkadian studies in France and Germany were founded by Oppert and or his students, led to researchers ignoring the evidence that the Sumerians, Akkadians, and Assyrians were Black.

In summary, the cuneiform evidence makes it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians, and Assyrians recognized themselves as Negroes: “black heads”. This fact was supported by the statues of Gudea, the Akkadians and Assyrians. Plus the Behistun monument made it clear that the Elamites were also Blacks.

The textual evidence also makes it clear that Oppert began the discussion of a typological relationship between Sumerian and Turkic languages (after Rawlinson identified the Sumerians-Akkadians as Turanian or Scythic people). He also manufactured the idea that the Semites of Mesopotamia and Iran, the Assyrians and Akkadians were “whites”, like himself (you can find a long and winding blurb on the Caucasoidness/Europeoidness of the N.Africans in most of the English-language popular materials. But anybody who saw an Egyptian mummy, and a mummy of a tanned white-skinned corps, can tell that the Hamitic Egyptiand were not lily-white at all, and had a curly hair). Due to this brain washing, and whitening out of Blacks in history, many people today can look at depictions of Assyrians, Achamenians, and Akkadians and fail to see the Negro origin of these people.

To make the Sumerians “white”, the textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.

 

Listen to this post